Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Fair is fair

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Fair is fair
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:39:45 -0700
>
>At 01:27 PM 9/13/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I'm really sorry Dave found it necessary to post a private e-mail to 
>>>the reflector. Apparently Dave thinks it's OK to publish a private e-
>>>mail exchange.
>>>
>>?  It's ok to publish anything I e-mail except pre-specified items 
>>involving third parties.  If Dave did not violate a specific pre 
>>agreement, tough luck, Mr. Rauch.  (violin music) For example, if I told 
>>someone that Dennis Had reportedly lost Ameritron because he was caught 
>>in flagrante delicto on his desk by his significant other, it would 
>>naturally be unethical to discuss it publically.  
>
>It is unethical, because its none of your business. 

It is apparently a matter of court record.  The sale of Ameritron was 
reporetedly ordered by the court.  

> It isn't anyone else's
>business either.  But that's the second time you've written those words in
>the past year. Why you would delight in someone else's failure is....open
>to interpretation.

According to rumour, there were two such incidents with separate wives 
and separate companies.  
>
later, Phil

-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>