>
>At 01:27 PM 9/13/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I'm really sorry Dave found it necessary to post a private e-mail to
>>>the reflector. Apparently Dave thinks it's OK to publish a private e-
>>>mail exchange.
>>>
>>? It's ok to publish anything I e-mail except pre-specified items
>>involving third parties. If Dave did not violate a specific pre
>>agreement, tough luck, Mr. Rauch. (violin music) For example, if I told
>>someone that Dennis Had reportedly lost Ameritron because he was caught
>>in flagrante delicto on his desk by his significant other, it would
>>naturally be unethical to discuss it publically.
>
>It is unethical, because its none of your business.
It is apparently a matter of court record. The sale of Ameritron was
reporetedly ordered by the court.
> It isn't anyone else's
>business either. But that's the second time you've written those words in
>the past year. Why you would delight in someone else's failure is....open
>to interpretation.
According to rumour, there were two such incidents with separate wives
and separate companies.
>
later, Phil
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|