Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] BC610... no 833's

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] BC610... no 833's
From: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 22:51:12 -0400
Wrongo Tom! The later models, (specifically the I model, which was the last)
and the when the government no longer needed them Bill Halligan returned the
old HT-4 label  to them, always had an a 250-T(L?) modulated by 100-TH's.
The BC-610 was later replaced in military by the durable T-368 transmitter
which used a 4-400 modulated by 4-125's, (Not my choice, I prefer triodes as
modulators.). But they were never made with 813's or 833's.
Mike(y)
W3SLK

----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>; George T. Daughters
<gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] BC610... no 833's


>
> > "BC-610 output tank coils that were used in a plate modulated
> > c1940 transmitter that ran a pushpull pair of 833 modulated by 810's (?
> > before my time).  The BC-610 tank used a nifty swinging coil output link
> > coupling."
>
> As I recall, later BC-610's used 813's modulated by 810's.
>
> Early ones used those old Eimac tubes like 100TL's or something.
>
>
>
> 73, Tom W8JI
> w8ji@contesting.com
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>