Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1

To: "Larry Emery" <k1uo@uninets.net>,"Jim Kearman" <jkearman@att.net>, "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>,<amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1
From: "Larry Emery" <k1uo@uninets.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:20:07 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
BTW:   I'd definately choose the 87A


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Emery" <k1uo@uninets.net>
To: "Jim Kearman" <jkearman@att.net>; "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>; 
<amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1


OTOH, if you tried it and still didn't like it does that mean your still a
Lid?    Gawd,  Ican't believe I've made it this far DXing (have them all)
and Contesting (Won my share) and still have not reverted to QSK!

Here's hoping I don't need that parachute <8^)

73 right back at ya!
Larry  K1UO


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Kearman" <jkearman@att.net>
To: "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1



From: "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>
> Gee....guess you can include me in your list of lids, there Jim!  Over 50
> thousand cw contest q's and never a qsk contact among them.

OTOH, if you've never used QSK, how do you know it wouldn't help? I've never
used a parachute, either, but in certain circumstances I hear they're pretty
handy. :)

73,

Jim, KR1S
http://kr1s.kearman.com/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>