Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1

To: jkearman@att.net, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1
From: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:17:51 EST
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 2/22/2006 1:53:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
jkearman@att.net writes:

If a DX  station is listening on or close to his frequency and has a pileup, 
which is  the usual case in a contest, you have to be able to hear when the DX 
goes back  to someone -- you, for example. If I had a buck for every time 
I've heard a DX  station go back to someone who then proceeded to dump his call 
in again  because he didn't use QSK, I could afford a new  Alpha.




Good point, I indeed have heard just what you mention here but, I would not  
go so far as to call someone a LID if they don't use QSK.  You all can tout  
QSK all you want, but calling someone a LID for not using it is totally 
uncalled  for.  Besides isn't CW (morse code) going to be history soon anyway?  
 
Pretty soon the companies will delete QSK from their rigs. Hi  Hi
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>