Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Reply-to: garyschafer@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:38:17 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
> On
> > Behalf Of Gudguyham@aol.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:18 PM
> > To: jkearman@att.net; amps@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 2/22/2006 1:53:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > jkearman@att.net writes:
> >
> > If a DX  station is listening on or close to his frequency and has a
> > pileup,
> > which is  the usual case in a contest, you have to be able to hear when
> > the
> > DX goes back  to someone -- you, for example. If I had a buck for every
> > time
> > I've heard a DX  station go back to someone who then proceeded to dump
> his
> > call in again  because he didn't use QSK, I could afford a new  Alpha.
> >

I guess that then makes all SSB contesters lids?

73
Gary  K4FMX


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>