| To: | amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] QSK or not |
| From: | "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net> |
| Reply-to: | Gary@doctorgary.net |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:38:04 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
> But for chasing DX either simplex or split I find > QSK to be a potent tool. One more way to beat the masses. So those of you > not yet using it, please continue that way. It gives me and the others using > QSK and edge. Absolutely right. Gary ka1j _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] QSK or not, Keith Dutson |
| Previous by Thread: | [Amps] QSK or not, Ron Spencer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] QSK or not, Keith Dutson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |