On Feb 23, 2006, at 3:46 AM, Ed Swynar wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Well, I've tried QSK --- tried to FORCE myself to like it, even! ---
> but
> it's just not for me, I'm afraid...reminds me too much of operating
> SSB with
> the VOX delay control set to near zero, where you can hear the
> background
> noise on the frequency between every spoken sylllable.
By backing off the RF Gain control, one doesn't hears little background
noise.
> ...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] QSK or not
>
>
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:37:13 -0500, Ed Swynar wrote:
>>
>>> I think to-day's operators are far sloppier in their
>>> sending than those of, say, 25 years ago, when QSK may NOT have been
>>> as
>>> prevalent as it is to-day
>>
>> Until the advent of rice box transceivers designed primarily for SSB
>> with
>> CW as an afterthought, QSK was pretty much the rule on the CW bands.
>> In
>> fact, one of the major reasons for the high level of acceptance of Ten
>> Tec by CW ops is that from the beginning, all of their products, both
>> amps and transceivers, work full QSK and do it quite well. The same is
>> true of Elecraft, also quite popular with CW ops, both contesters and
>> otherwise. Luckily, most decent transceivers today will do QSK just
>> fine.
>>
>> So it was the designers of equipment who made those decisions, and of
>> purchasers when they bought the gear without QSK because there were
>> few
>> other choices. It costs more to build a transceiver and an amp with
>> QSK,
>> so the WalMart syndrome drove things.
>>
>> I've heard some folks say that they are distracted by hearing the band
>> when they're trying to send. But if they hear stuff on their own
>> frequency, perhaps they shouldn't be transmitting! Or perhaps the RF
>> gain is turned up too high, or the IF filter is too broad. Some ops
>> need
>> to write it all down to copy it, other more experienced ops don't. As
>> the
>> old musician gag goes, "How do you get to Carnegie Hall? -- practice,
>> practice, practice."
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jim K9YC
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|