Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED

To: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED
From: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:21:42 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On May 31, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Vic K2VCO wrote:

> k7fm wrote:
>
>> I have built amplifiers with and without parasitic suppressors and  
>> have had
>> parasitics in both - but then again, I am only an amateur.
>
> There's a technique described in my old ARRL Handbooks (1960's  
> vintage)
> to test an amplifier for self-oscillation -- at LF, HF, and VHF. It
> describes the testing procedure, and discusses creating a  
> suppressor (in
> the case of VHF parasitics) that will prevent oscillation with the
> smallest amount of loss.

  In an HF amplifier, the old ARRL Handbook test tests HF stability,  
not VHF stability.

> Rather than simply copying suppressors used in
> other amplifiers with physically different layouts, it seems to me  
> that
> this procedure is a reasonable thing to do when building an amplifier.
> It might turn out that no VHF suppressor is needed -- or not.
> -- 
> 73,
> Vic, K2VCO
> Fresno CA
> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>