Gary,
I second that! It seems as if one makes a slight faux pas on here any more, one
gets admonished in a rather strong way. I've had it directed at myself several
times over harmless things. I have also seen others get by with almost murder
and nothing be said. I'm like you, I'm not taking up for Rich either, as he has
the ability to do that his self. It seems that any form of humor gets a frown
from like some of the things I've posted about just for a little levity over a
subject. To be honest, I'm almost afraid to post some things anymore. I thought
the amateur community was for one to help each other, not be so strict it
hampers conversation. That's just my point of view of course.
Best,
Will
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 6/3/06 at 10:33 PM Gary Schafer wrote:
>We certainly seem to have a moderator (whoever he is) who has difficulty
>in
>recognizing the difference between personal attacks, snide remarks and
>outright humor.
>
>Please - give us all a break here. I don't believe for one minute that
>Riche's comments that you are complaining about are meant to be anything
>but
>humorous.
>List moderation pointed in the wrong direction has probably caused more to
>leave this list than any comments by list members.
>
>I am not defending Rich, as I think he is quite capable of doing that
>himself, I am just letting it be known that I am a little tired of some of
>the strange comments that are made by the mystery moderator.
>
>73
>Gary K4FMX
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
>> Behalf Of Administrator
>> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 6:23 PM
>> To: 'R L Measures'
>> Cc: amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED
>>
>>
>> Rich,
>>
>> That is uncalled for and inappropriate. If you continue with
>> this line of personal attack, your postings will be held for
>> review (moderation). After that point any continuation will
>> result in your removal from this list.
>>
>> You have regularly resorted to snide remarks and personal
>> attack rather than solid scientific and engineering proof.
>> That behavior has cost this reflector some of its best and
>> brightest over the years and caused the late Bill Fisher,
>> W4AN to give serious consideration to closing the list.
>>
>> In view of your contributions, I have tolerated your behavior
>> over the years but you are pushing the limits.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> ... Administrator
>> amps@contesting.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: amps-bounces@contesting.com
>> > [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of R L Measures
>> > Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 5:08 PM
>> > To: W7RY
>> > Cc: amps@contesting.com
>> > Subject: Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Jun 3, 2006, at 10:48 AM, W7RY wrote:
>> >
>> > > I sure wish Good Guy Ham would sign his emails... (That is
>> > > just commom courtesy). It sure would be nice to know who he is.
>> >
>> > Maybe he likes to hide in bushes? Perhaps he has an outstanding
>> > warrant?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|