Well, if I´m going to use almost a KW just to heat the tube
I certainly wouldn´t run just a measly 1 KW of RF power. I
would use the tube to more or less it´s full potential!
That´s how I run all my amplifiers, even if it would happen
to be a 4 by 10.
73 Jim SM2EKM
-------------
Peter Voelpel wrote:
> Why not,
> if you don´t bother the power bill you can easily achieve a super clean
> legal limit signal which will be much better then any ham linear.
> Of course it needs to be be driven by a transmitter with best purity,
> perhaps the PT-8000C could be nice or a Racal MA1723 with a 4CX350J or
> YL1050 in class A as the driver ;-)
>
> 73
> Peter, DF3KV
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Jan Erik Holm
> Sent: Sonntag, 2. Juli 2006 17:55
> Cc: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX10 000J
>
> surely no ham would use a thing like that, or?
>
> / Jim SM2EKM
> ----------------
>
> Peter Voelpel wrote:
>
>
>>All the J-types are low distortion, gain of both is about 20db
>>
>>73
>>Peter, DF3KV
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
>>Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
>>What are the differences between the 4CX1000J and 4CX10000D -
>>particularly to explain the 10 KW vs. 15 KW output difference
>>in the "normal operation" figures on the Eimac short form
>>catalog (www.cpii.com/eimac)? Of course, with a listed gain
>>of 4.5, it would seem to take 2500 W or so to drive either of
>>them to their full capability ...
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|