I'm reminded of an experiment that was allegedly conducted in Europe several
decades ago. A large group of people was assembled in plain view of a tall
tower. Each person was asked to write down his estimate of the height of the
tower. The guesses were collected and the average was calculated. The
average was announced to the group, then they all got to guess again. After
several iterations, so the story goes, the result converged on the correct
number.
Jim, AF6O
> >Looks like a number of responses were centered around 6000 watts based on
>>25% efficiency. (1500 watts / .25).
>
> Im confused as to how the number of responses with a given answer means
> that the answer is valid. The laws of physics are established by mother
> nature, not majority vote. You got a pretty definitive answer (with a
> pretty good explanation) from W8JI, a guy who designs amplifiers for a
> living. Isnt that good enough?
>
> Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|