Carl wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 7:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Advice
>
>
>
>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:15:27 -0500, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If you want to critique Id appreciate it if you dont edit my post to suit
>>> your reply.
>>>
>> REPLY:
>>
>> Ok, but in this instance it doesn't make any difference. Here's your
>> entire
>> quote:
>>
>> "Some of the cooling specs appear to be highly variable. I suspect that as
>> engineering staff changed and tube application changed the combination
>> resulted in different numbers.
>>
>> In other cases the spec was written for CCS worse case wheras in ham
>> CW/SSB use
>> the seal temperature caveat was used fo CYA. This leads to a lot of
>> guessing for home brew especially when temperature testing is not done."I
>>
>> I think where we are having a misunderstanding is your statement "Some of
>> the
>> cooling specs appear to be highly variable." If you mean AIRFLOW specs, I
>> agree. If you mean COOLING REQUIREMENTS, I disagree.
>>
>
>
> I said cooling specs. What that refers to are tubes that the spec changed
> over different revisions of the spec sheet. Seal temperature is a constant
> these days but was not always so as processes improved..
>
It's quite common when going through designs for ceramic/metal tubes
from different times to see the maximum seal temps vary from 200 to 250C.
73
Roger (K8RI)
> Carl
> KM1H
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|