Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Silk screen alternatives

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Silk screen alternatives
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:20:57 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Silk screen alternatives


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:32:14 +0000, Manfred Mornhinweg
> <manfred@ludens.cl> wrote:
>
>>and prefer the smooth, clean
>>look of an unlabelled panel!
>
> REPLY:
>
> Yes, I have no problem with the tune and load controls and the meters,
> but that nine-position bandswitch has GOT to be marked!  :-)
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>

That reminds me of the RME-69 receiver of the 30's; lots of knobs and not a 
marking to be found. The builders reasoning was that anyone who bought it 
already had sufficient smarts to use it.

Carl
KM1H

_______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>