Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay
From: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 05:38:53 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:10:46 -0700
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] A few nice ones on Ebay
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:25:13 -0700, "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
wrote:

>##  Now that the league has endorsed a xcvr that cover's 24.890 to 30 mhz.... 
>and
>both sidebands.. and AM /FM.... the 12-10m  portion of the spectrum  is a 
>complete
>right off. 

REPLY:

Have the rules changed? Such a transceiver used to be illegal, i.e.
not type-accepted. Has the ARRL "endorsed" an illegal transceiver?

Details, please. 

73, Bill W6WRT

##  I don't know if it's still  made or not Bill.  It was written up a few yrs 
back in the
arrl lab /qst.. 'recent reviews'  .  It came in 2 x versions... 25 w pep.. and 
150w pep. 
Ran on 12 vdc.  Now who else besides RTTY  ops use LSB  on 10/12M ?? 

## It was marketed as a ... " 10 + 12m"   amateur radio xcvr....that would TX  
on  both
10m.. and also 12m.     It would ALSO   RX, continuously  from  24-30 mhz [ and 
I think it was
as high as 32 mhz].   

##  of course, it took all of 3 x secs  to cut the green wire.. and then it 
would TX  from
24-32 mhz.   And it was type accepted.   QST  gave it glowing reports.  It has 
lousy TX
IMD... but it was relatively cheap to buy.  I think the 150w  version was 
another $100-$150
more than the 25 w  version.   It was clearly marketed to the 11m crowd. 

later.. Jim  VE7RF

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>