Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 160M PI network Toroidal Coil

To: g8on@fsmail.net
Subject: Re: [Amps] 160M PI network Toroidal Coil
From: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:09:42 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The SI570 chip is an interesting alternative for a DDS. I have measured the phase noise at -139 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz away from the carrier. It does require a microprocessor to load the registers but it is a simple chip otherwise. The other advantage is that it does not have the switching spurs that a DDS has although the DDS chips are getting better from that perspective. The SI570 does not have the frequency stability capability of a DDS, but I am using it at 24 MHz for an LO and it holds within less than 10 Hz.

Tom   W0IVJ


On 10/8/2013 1:36 PM, peter chadwick wrote:
Manfred,

it is interesting to look at the WW2 German radio equipment - obviously 
designed pre-1939. The use of ceramics, especially in capacitors, and iron 
cores is interesting, to say the least.

Nowadays of course I use DDS chips instead of VFOs, so that problem has
  been solved<

Has it? unless all the spur and noise  powers summed in a 1 MHz bandwidth are 
at least - IN THAT 1MHZ- average -110dBc/Hz - from
100Hz away from the frequency. You don't meet the requirements ot the Radio 
Regulations.

73

Peter G3RZP

=======================================
  Message Received: Oct 08 2013, 07:26 PM
  From: "Manfred Mornhinweg" <manfred@ludens.cl>
  To: g8on@fsmail.net
  Cc: amps@contesting.com
  Subject: Re: 160M PI network Toroidal Coil
Peter, > The numbers I've seen for flux density suggest that at 160m, you
  > should be at no more than 100 gauss or 10 mT for reasonable losses
  > and linearity.......and preferably a bit less.
Yes, that's about correct. The exact value varies a bit with core
  material, size, and so on, but will be close to 10mT.
This tends to require long, relatively slender cores, or very low
  permability ones.
> So even if you cool the toroid, I'm still a bit doubtful about
  > linearity.
So am I. But the emphasis is on "doubtful". I would have to try it, as I
  don't have good data about that material's linearity. Real saturation
  anyway only starts at much higher flux density levels. But hysteresis
  effects have a good chance to cause significant nonlinearity.
> Plus there's the temperature coefficient to consider, too. As long as the loaded Q is low enough, that shouldn't become a real
  problem in a tank circuit. It's much worse when you are trying to make a
  VFO coil on an powdered iron core, as is often suggested in ARRL
  literature! In my youth I built several radios with "automatic built-in
  scanner" that way, until I figured out that nice big air core coils are
  far more stable!
Nowadays of course I use DDS chips instead of VFOs, so that problem has
  been solved!
> Fortunately, dust iron has a fairly high Curie temperature, but that
  > needs to be given some consideration - I suspect Amidon don't have a
  > figure for it.
I think that the Curie temperature is probably high enough, so that
  insulation failure of the wire, or binder degradation of the core, are
  the limiting factors.
> For some reason, I've never been a big fan of toroidal dust iron
  > inductors....
They have their uses, where they provide some worthwhile advantage over
  other solutions. But they are certainly not an essential type of
  component. If all iron dust cores disappeared from this world, I could
  still design all my circuits, with only minor limitations, using either
  air core coils or ferrite cores, depending on the case. Instead if
  ferrite was taken away from this world, life would be much harder! Some
  kinds of circuits we are used to just couldn't be built.
Manfred ========================
  Visit my hobby homepage!
  http://ludens.cl
  ========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>