Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] repair of older Command Tech VHF-2000 amp
From: Vic K2VCO <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:27:20 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Answers to pure multiple-choice exams are easy to memorize. When I took amateur and commercial exams more than 50 years ago, schematics were required, as well as a number of mathematical computations. If there are enough different exams with varied math problems, then it's hard to memorize the answers. Of course, schematics require some knowledge on the part of the examiner to grade!

CW was also important simply because learning takes time and therefore requires commitment. I know I've heard over and over that some people are 'disabled' so that they can't learn CW and therefore the requirement is 'unfair', but I suspect that the real number of such cases is very small.

On 10/15/2013 7:50 AM, Manfred Mornhinweg wrote:
Carl,

I dont know the current requirements for various levels of licenses in the UK 
but over
here even a certified retard can pass an Extra as no CW is required and anyone 
can be
trained to memorize enough of the question pool to eventually pass.

I can confirm that in Chile we have that same situation.

In my opinion, though, the problem is not lack of CW testing. I don't see any 
reason why
CW proficiency should be tested, while at the same time proficiency in other 
specific
modes is NOT tested. Instead I would say that the main problem lies in the fact 
that there
is a limited, open, published question pool, from which all exam questions are 
taken. Any
fool can memorize the questions and their correct answers, and score 100% in 
the exam,
without understanding even one word of what he memorized.

The exam should really test knowledge and understanding of radio, not the 
ability to
memorize sentences.

And the second problem is, of course, the low level of the questions. In this 
regard I
would like strongly differentiated levels. The novice exam should be easy, to 
encourage
people to start in the hobby. The only knowledge that should be required from a 
novice is
the minimal one that allows him to operate without causing serious trouble to 
other
people. General class should be quite a lot harder, so that only people who 
understand
matters like intermodulation, relationship between a waveform and its spectral 
display,
and who are able to repair a radio and build a power supply, know how to 
participate a
contest and survive a pile-up, can get a general license. And the extra class 
exam should
really be "extra", requiring profound knowledge and proven exceptional activity 
as a ham,
so that it is a challenge to obtain that licence, and a honor to hold it.

But we are far from that, and getting ever farther away. And that's true in 
most countries.

Manfred

========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

--
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>