Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited

To: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>, <donroden@hiwaay.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited
From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:04:27 -0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Not true Gary.

And we are not talking about using a tuner between the solid state exciter and the amplifier.

73
Jim W7RY


-----Original Message----- From: Gary Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 11:57 AM
To: donroden@hiwaay.net ; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited

It means that-- if you are looking at the SWR at your radio and there is a
tuner after the SWR bridge, any changes in cable length after the tuner will
show a change in SWR at the radio if you do not touch the tuners tuning.
This assumes that the load on the end of the cable is not 1:1.

2nd, the SWR will always remain the same at the radio no matter what length
of cable is used (except or cable loss) or what the load impedance is as
long as that load impedance remains the same.

73
Gary  K4FMX

-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
donroden@hiwaay.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 2:01 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited

Clear as Mud .........
What does it all mean ???

Don W4DNR
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>