| To: | amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Alpha 87 (not 87A) |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:57:09 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On 11/7/2017 11:57 AM, Steve Wright wrote: That is a BELIEF. It's not SCIENCE. No, it is measurement with calibrated instrumentation. HOW many? What percentage? Quote the ACTUAL numbers, aside from what you BELIEVE. You certainly seem to want to argue. I don't. If you care, turn on your radio, listen, and count them yourself. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Problem with my Henry 2K-4A, Stan Gammons |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] Accidental Alpha 87A, Frank Kirschner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Alpha 87 (not 87A), Steve Wright |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Alpha 87 (not 87A), Steve Wright |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |