[CQ-Contest] SO2R a new category?

[w7why@freewwweb.com (Tom Osborne)]

Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote:

> My SO2R opinions aside, I agree with Tree and others that a >solid, 
> detectable, enforceable definition of SO2R must be >developed before any 
> category could be considered, and I think coming up with that will be tough.


I think it would be nice to at least list the stations in the
results as SO1R or SO2R regardless of class or category.
Tom W7WHY


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com