<qdce8t4uio25kiipq0301tvimifc5gbaet@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com
Precedence: bulk
X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
Bill Turner wrote:
> Not only that, but it's one less letter for the other guy to get
> wrong.
Maybe I'm wrong, but in a contest, aren't we supposed to be testing ones
operating skill (to go quickly) and ones operating ability (to copy
callsigns correctly)? Does this mean having a shorter call is a benefit
to OTHER people so THEY can copy it easier?
If I know someone has my call wrong (which is why you should ALWAYS send
the call of the guy you're working before the report. That takes extra
time, I know - but you won't have my call wrong and get dinged for it),
I'll correct them so they at least have a chance to fix it ... it not,
that's their problem. It shouldn't be the 2X3's responsibilty to get a
shorter call to make it easier for everyone else.
Just an opinion from a 2X3 who does OK depite the handicap.
CU all next weekend!
Ron, WD4AHZ
--
One of the W1AW/4 Crew - IARU/WRTC-2000
WD4AHZ Homepage - http://www.qsl.net/wd4ahz
Sarasota Emergency Radio Club - http://www.qsl.net/serc
Florida Contest Group - http://www.qsl.net/fcg
Florida QSO Party Apr. 28 & 29 - http://www.qsl.net/fqp
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|