Subject: | [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ |
---|---|
From: | gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI) |
Date: | Sat Jan 12 22:14:36 2002 |
If CQ Magazine get there act together they could effectively poach the 3 main ARRL contests with a promise to publish the result in CQ. But are they shrewd enough to see an opportunity. As far as overseas subscribers are concerned I for one would cease to have any real interest in maintaining membership of the ARRL. How many like myself and others will it take for QST to have to be reduced in size even further. 73 Clive GM3POI -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Re: [YCCC] Proposed QST changes, Hit 'emwhere it Hurts $$$, Bob Johnson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Re: [YCCC] Proposed QST changes, Hit 'em where it Hurts $$$, David L. Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ, tony field |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ, Bob Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |