At 09:45 AM 1/28/2002 -0500, Gary J. Ferdinand wrote:
>Certainly there are fixed costs involved with having multiple magz that
>would be eliminated entirely. Then we are faced with the difference in per
>page costs between QST and the others.
>
>Have the Board considered making QST production cheaper per page, rather
>than going for elimination of content (which has the concommittant effect of
>lower advert prices and thus revenue - it's a spiral), holding per page
>costs constant or increasing?
>
>Just to use an extreme example to make the point, what if QST were published
>using the same style, paper, and overall publication quality as NCJ? What
>would the cost per page be then?
Hi Gary -
The paper the NCJ is printed on is actually better paper -- and more expensive
-- than QST paper. It's just not coated.
As for other costs of printing, I know K1RO and other in Newington are always
looking for ways to keep costs down. The biggest issue this year is an
increase in postage costs. Our estimate is 8% but the PO hasn't released
increase details for magazines yet as far as I know.
-- Tom
=====
e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/
Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|