CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Using a Bogus Check

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Using a Bogus Check
From: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson)
Date: Sat Apr 27 10:24:04 2002
>I'm thinking of doing it again.<

Al,

How could you? This interpretation of the SS rules is highly irregular. 
Clearly, you have created an unfair advantage for yourself in using a Bogus 
Check. Don't underestimate the significance of what you're doing here. Changing 
your check from your actual year first licensed to 55 seems to have given you a 
huge advantage in dits. Dats not fair. And changing your check to 00 in phone 
seems to have given you a similar advantage in zeros. Now, some will argue that 
the advantage is not that big; some will say its huge. Some will say they just 
don't have the resources to implement such an advantage for themselves.

This flagrant rules violation almost rises to the level of the Bogus Signal 
Report, now a widespread practice amongst hardcore contesters. How does a 
dedicated DXer challenge these uncaring contest ops who continually send a 59 
when the spirit of the rules dictate that correct report is "22 and please 
confirm your call"? To allow these upstanding DXers to compete on a level 
playing field, the category SOBS [Single-Op Bogus Signal Report] is long 
overdue.

At a minimum, you must self-declare yourself as SOBC, and the CAC should 
immediately begin deliberations on how to structure this serious new category 
of SS competition.

Jim Idelson K1IR
email    k1ir@designet.com
web    http://www.designet.com/k1ir


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>