You said:
> I have never understood the logic of encouraging everyone to enter
contests and then
> penalizing non-ARRL members with a 30 day waiting period.
Maybe to encourage people to join the ARRL? Seems a reasonable goal since
they are sponsoring the event...
Randy, K5ZD
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Sylvan Katz
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 15:06 PM
> To: Contest Reflector
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line
> scores decision)
>
>
> > I wouldn't mind 15 days either, but I can't, for the life of me, figure
> out
> > why that should improve timeliness of result delivery by more than 15
> > days. Put another way, all of what Trey proposes could be implemented
> just
> > as well if the deadline remained 30 days.
>
> Excellent point! 15 days is a small saving -- 6-12 months is a big saving.
> It would be less disruptive to leave the submission window at 30 days and
> have the results posted to the web within 60 days.
>
> BUT what happens if you are not an ARRL member - do you have to wait an
> additional 30 days until, for example, the SS results are release from the
> members only section? I have never understood the logic of encouraging
> everyone to enter contests and then penalizing non-ARRL members with a 30
> day waiting period. I wonder if this annoying and discriminating
> policy will
> change with movement of line scores to the web?
>
> .. sylvan
>
> Ô¿Ô¬
> ----------------
> Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX
> Saskatoon, SK
> "A Novel Perspective of Amateur Radio Contesting" at
> http://www.dynamicforesight.com/~ve5zx
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|