On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:58:13 -0700 (PDT), Chuck
<discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Wouldn't it be more productive to ASSUME a unique
>is OK and not worry about it UNLESS some
>convincing reason appears TO delete it?
_________________________________________________________
If I was a log checker, I'd ignore uniques UNLESS it made a difference
in the standings, and then only if it was for #1 vs #2. In that case,
I'd do my best to sort it out. Life's too short to spend time
otherwise.
--
Bill, W7TI
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|