Interesting reading all the posts and thoughts on
the unique QSO business.
One thought comes to mind..
Doesn't it strike anyone as a bit strange to
delete uniques as a rule rather than an
exception?
Doesn't that strike you as a bit odd? I mean it's
akin to being 'guilty until proven innocent'
rather than assuming 'innocent until proven
guilty'?
(of course, unlike the Court system of appeals,
there is NO recourse if the Sponsor chooses to
delete uniques. :-) )
Wouldn't it be more productive to ASSUME a unique
is OK and not worry about it UNLESS some
convincing reason appears TO delete it?
Seems like that would save a WHOLE lot of effort
and let us focus on other things of greater
value.
73
Chuck K3FT
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|