CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange

To: frugoli@worldlinkisp.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange
From: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 15:18:07 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
all good and fine, but answer the only important question: how to do you
get 100 ops or so to frequent both 80 and 160 meters in a JIDX or RDX or 
CQ-M contest?

mike w7dra
On Sun, 9 May 2004 21:27:51 -0400 "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)"
<frugoli@worldlinkisp.com> writes:
> G4BUO Wrote:
> 
> > Hence Ropoco - ROtating POst COdes. It's a lot of fun and meets 
> the aim 
> > of a meaningful exchange, but it's also very hard to explain what 
> it's 
> > all about to a casual contester.
> 
> How is this hard to explain.  "Send to the next guy what you 
> recieved in the previous exchange" seems to cover it pretty well.  
> Furthermore, little harm would be done if the casual contester just 
> sent his own postal code over and over again, as long as any log he 
> sends in shows that his sent exchange accurately on every qso.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>