Same way we do now, post the rules online in a clear concise format. Just has
to be clear that your log MUST reflect the exchange you send for each qso in
order to be scored correctly. Seems easy enough to me.
73 de Al, KE1FO
----- Original Message -----
From: mike l dormann
Sent: 5/8/2004 6:18:07 PM
To: frugoli@worldlinkisp.com
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange
> all good and fine, but answer the only important question: how to do you
> get 100 ops or so to frequent both 80 and 160 meters in a JIDX or RDX or
> CQ-M contest?
>
> mike w7dra
> On Sun, 9 May 2004 21:27:51 -0400 "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)"
> <frugoli@worldlinkisp.com> writes:
> > G4BUO Wrote:
> >
> > > Hence Ropoco - ROtating POst COdes. It's a lot of fun and meets
> > the aim
> > > of a meaningful exchange, but it's also very hard to explain what
> > it's
> > > all about to a casual contester.
> >
> > How is this hard to explain. "Send to the next guy what you
> > recieved in the previous exchange" seems to cover it pretty well.
> > Furthermore, little harm would be done if the casual contester just
> > sent his own postal code over and over again, as long as any log he
> > sends in shows that his sent exchange accurately on every qso.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|