To: | CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Unassisted vs. Assisted vs. Self-Assisted |
From: | "John W" <xnewyorka@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 21 May 2004 12:32:51 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Hi all, I recently received the report of the errors in my CW Sweepstakes log. While I made only a handful of copying errors, there were a large number of people who "copied" my check as "66", when in fact I was sending "77". I was using a club call sign which had been used in a previous year, at which time the check "66" had been used. This causes me to suspect that those people who "copied" 66 instead of 77 were using their software (or a previous log) instead of their ears to obtain my exchange. A few years back, I operated Sweepstakes as a guest op somewhere else, and used my host station's call, but I sent my own check instead of his. The same thing happened - dozens of people "copied" 63 for my check, when I had actually sent 77. I know it reduces THEIR score and not my own, so maybe I shouldn't be miffed about this. HOWEVER, I have the following complaints: 1) As far as I'm concerned, these contacts were not valid, because the person didn't copy what I sent. 2) This practice seems to defeat the intent of the contest, which is an exchange of INFORMATION, not merely an exchange of a callsign and serial number (or, worse yet, just an exchange of callsigns like CQWW). Since I know we'll never put a stop to people using software in this way, I would like to propose we do one of the following: a) Ops who use any software or other tool (not including their own brain) that supplies them with any data that they do not copy off the air shall be required to enter in an ASSISTED category (since, alas, they are truly being assisted, right?!) -or- b) Create a new "Self-Assisted" category between Unassisted and Assisted, thus resulting in the following three categories: Unassisted - meaning all exchanges and callsigns were copied entirely off the air with no assistance, databases, written lists, etc., and no packet or internet spotting was used to locate any stations or for any other reason Self-Assisted - meaning no packet or internet spotting was used to locate any stations or for any other reason, but software or other aids may be used to provide a list of valid callsigns (super-check partial, etc.), previously known exchanges, etc. Assisted - No limitations on use of spotting, callsign or exchange databases, etc. Let the debate begin.... John WA2GO Certified old school contester
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: LotW - Needs More Participation, Joe Subich, K4IK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: RE: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation, Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO) |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re: LotW - Needs More Participation, Salina Physician Anesthesia |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unassisted vs. Assisted vs. Self-Assisted, Doug Smith W9WI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |