CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders
From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:40:39 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
9A6XX added:

Like somebody mentioned before using a DX cluster and claiming unassisted is
nothing compared to cheating on other stuff - excessive power and so on.

A few more dB just on the transmit side achieves more than say being able to sit & run all the time, then quickly S&P new mults because there is no need to find them, allowing one to quickly resume running?

A few more dB just on the transmit side achieves more than a self-spot
that changes a situation from CQing to oneself to a having a mini-pileup?

Maybe by excessive power, we are talking _really_ excessive power, as
those two examples would be far more beneficial by my reckoning than
running gas - especially when gas doesn't help one hear better.

Perhaps depending on where you are, abuse of spotting has a different
potential & therefore a different perceived level of evil - just like in the case
of power, the nearly 6 dB many have on a lot of us & still be within the rules
may not sit right with the latter.


Likewise, spotting abuse as a whole may not register with some as bad.
A black holer self-spotting himself is not likely to achieve much in CQ WW,
is it? ;^)

73, HL1/VR2BrettGraham

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>