CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again

To: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:29:20 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:27:58 -0600, Kelly Taylor wrote:

>But, if I have a shortened beam at 30 feet, a homebrew 4-400A amp that's
>hardly ever used, a TS-850SAT as my main radio and a TS-130s feeding an
>HF6V, and somehow that's an unfair advantage that means I should be punted
>into a different category?
>
>Hello. What am I missing? The multiple towers are certainly a much better
>advantage than a second radio.

_________________________________________________________

I disagree.  The second radio allows you to listen during 100% of the
contest, and on other bands if you like.  No amount of antenna or
amplifier hardware can do that.

--
Bill W6WRT



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.2 - Release Date: 11/24/2004

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>