Tom,
"Several marine radio manufacturers have
now specified 14.300 as a marine emergency frequency and written
it in the manuals for their new radios."
Sounds like commercial interests have decided that 14300 is now for their
customers, and not an amateur radio frequency. Perhaps these users are
really not amateur radio operators and could not figure out how to use
another frequency if they had to?
Since there are no contests on 17 meters, there would be no QRM from this
activity to this net. Indicating that ever moving the net to that band
"would place lives in danger", well that is really rubbish.
You want an exclusive frequency to do what you want to do, that is not
granted in my license, nor in yours.
I was asked by NN2NN to move because I was on 14298. He asked in a very
polite way. I moved . After reading your pious position, I will think twice
about it.
73, Albert
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom VE3II
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 7:00 AM
To: n6ki@juno.com; cq-contest@contesting.com; swojton@wzrd.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz
Hi Dennis....
Oh, if were just that easy.
Dennis, 14.300 has, over the years, become the de facto emergency
frequency on 20 meters. Several marine radio manufacturers have
now specified 14.300 as a marine emergency frequency and written
it in the manuals for their new radios.
Over the past few years we have handled numerous emergency
medical incidents, vessels in distress and a pirate attack "in
progress" from non-amateur stations because they knew to come to
14.300 for assistance. How did they know? Because, aside from
the thousands of amateurs who listen to the net each day,
thousands of other non-hams listen to the net. They listen for
information, weather updates, hurricane bulletins or to just to
listen to someone while they are out on the sea. They are also
told by other boaters that if you need help, go to 14.300.
Moving the net to 17 meters, or any other frequency, is not an
option. This would create a totally unacceptable and dangerous
situation that would place lives in jeopardy. Unlike contesting,
what we do on 14.300 is serious, life and death work. We don't
collect points, we don't go for the rare ones, we save lives.
You speak of the uninformed contester, what about the uninformed
mariner who "didn't get the email" that the net was going to move
for the weekend? What would happen if he has an emergency during
a contest and comes to 14.300 for help and finds no one? Unlike
a contest, an emergency at sea is not a scheduled event.
In my opinion, the more prudent and responsible action is for the
contest promoters, CQ and the ARRL, to amend the contest rules
concerning frequencies of operation.
The rules for this weekends contest were two pages long. They
defined multipliers, prefixes, categories, specifying power
limits, how to submit your log and so on. A single, one line
rule could be added saying that "...this contest will operate
between frequency X and frequency Y". Is that so hard to do?
Sure, some contesters might argue about it. Some may even refuse
to participate because of it. But the majority would accept it.
They might even agree with it if they knew the whole story.
Let me refer you to an article I wrote last spring (2004) for
QRZ. http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=3;t=58793
This may help to clarify our position.
You were concerned about enforcement. Let me assure you, Dennis,
that if a wary contester strayed out of the contest bandwidth, he
would be set upon by those not participating. I really don't
think enforcement would be an issue :)
Over the past couple of years I have heard from both CQ and the
ARRL about how they can't do this. They both suggested that we
move the net to a WARC band for the weekend, just like you did.
They also suggested it would be impossible to enforce, just like
you did.
What I would like is a straight answer as to why this can't be
done. Is there a bigger picture that non-contest stations are
not aware of? Is there a bylaw in the CQ or ARRL constitution
that prohibits this? Or is the ARRL and CQ just afraid to do
anything about it?
Unless this issue is resolved, God help the sailor who runs into
trouble at sea on a contest weekend and needs help.
73 .....
Tom VE3II
A/Mgr. MMSN
http://mmsn.org
From: "n6ki@juno.com" <n6ki@juno.com>
Date sent: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 03:16:17 GMT
To: swojton@wzrd.com
Copies to: cq-contest@contesting.com,
ve3ii@zing-net.ca
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz
A noble cause but difficult to enforce.
Your other choices, if the word just doesn't get out to ALL contestors, is
to waste a lot of time chasing uninformed contestors away from your freq,
which in essence will go on for as long as there is any propagation on
14.300 or since you also know, in advance that the contests are coming, try
using some alternate solutions.
One might be to move your net to 17 mtrs which has as good as
20 mtr propagation most of the time. You may want to run a few practice nets
in advance to see how 17 works and to let people be ready for the time when
you may have to QSY.
I know it would be great if all contetsors stayed at least 3 kHz away
from 14.300, but to be practical, it isn't going to happen anytime soon.
Most contestors really do not want to interfere with your net but no matter
how hard you try...you will waste a lot of time and effort chasing the
UNINFORMED contestors away.
73, Dennis N6KI
___________________________________________________________________
Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|