At 06:07 PM 7/27/2005, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>You are not going to maintain security by eliminating the
>security ... that's like killing the patient to "cure the
>disease"
_________________________________________________
You guys are wearing me out here, but let me say it one more time:
I don't want to reduce security. I want the security processing to occur at
the ARRL's end, not at the user's end.
This is how the banks do it. It works for them and it should be plenty good
enough for us.
Until the ARRL makes the above possible, we are all losing QSLs from
stations which choose not to use it because of it's complexity.
It is not "too complex", it is "unnecessarily complex".
Simplify it and they will come.
Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|