CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over It

To: cq-contest reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over It
From: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:17:34 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I have read, I think in the QCWA Quarterly, a strong assertion by a 
retired FCC employee (W3BE?) that the /M and /MM designators in common 
use are illegal for FCC licenses now that England and Scotland are using 
M and MM calls.  This would mean a radical change in identification for 
mobile and maritime mobile stations and I have not heard anyone adopting 
any other designation.  I suppose the answer is not to send either, but 
I am pretty sure that FCC regs require Martime Mobiles using FCC issued 
callsigns to identify as such and to give the ITU Region being operated 
from.  When I was first licensed, mobile stations had to identify 
themselves as mobile and give the nearest QTH, AND had to notify the FCC 
in advance in writing of the proposed mobile trip route and itinerary. 
Of course, at that time and for years afterward, English stations 
started with "G" and Scottish with "GM."  For a brief period, stations 
in San Marino signed "M" calls (I remember M1IN and others), before 
being assigned "9A" as a prefix, which they later abandoned in favor of 
the current "T77."  Legal or not, I can't envision US mobile CW stations 
not signing "/M."  It would probably take prosecution or other 
enforcement action against some of them (us) to bring about a change. 
If the FCC is serious about this, they should put out some kind of a 
press release other than an opinion column in one magazine.

73,

John, K4BAI.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>