CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The irony of Operating Time [was: Logging Time [was:Con

To: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The irony of Operating Time [was: Logging Time [was:Contesting Time Calculation]]
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 05:23:12 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:41:53AM -0800, Radiosporting Fan wrote:
> > It is not unusual for me to look at my log during
> > offtime to see what multipliers I have missed and
> > prepare a checklist for the following night of
> > lowband dxing or even next day higher bands.
> > 
> > Thus keystrokes and I think this is not counted as
> > operating time.
> 
> I think that you are correct (from what I understand
> of HF rules anyway), Dick.  How strange this is.  One
> can engage in an activity that clearly benefits ones
> score as noted above but doesn't count toward
> "operating time" while they can also engage in
> "SWLing" which doesn't benefit ones score and it does
> count.

SWLing could definitely benefit your score.  I think
that listening and finding new stations to work the 
moment your off time expires would be a much bigger 
direct benefit to your score than log analysis.

> Of course I'm looking at this through "VHF Contester's
> Glasses" where there is no limitation on operating
> time so I may be missing something obvious to others. 
> Am I?

Operating time refers to operating the radio - not 
operating a computer.

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>