Quack Says
I've begged and pleaded , especally on Sunday in SS for anyone anywhere for
a contact, Its really easy guys just give me your call and I talk you
through the exchange. I don't tell them to go works somone else but I do
say thanks for NR 1 and if you works somone else they would be NR 2. 73
CQ SS
When I get a NR 1 I say to myself , hope he doesn't work W7WA .
Although I have gotten on in some contest and given Dan a Q.
Rex aka Quack
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
To: "'CQ Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique perspectives
> Who has said anything about changing rules for contests to remove
> uniques????
>
> This discussion started over the one-time special rescoring done for wrtc
> participants because of suspected irregularities in some logs. I have
> seen
> nothing from any other contest sponsor that indicates that this practice
> may
> spread to other contests (besides the few odd ones that have been doing
> this
> all along).
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
>> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mark Bailey
>> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 21:05
>> To: CQ Contest
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique perspectives
>>
>>
>>
>> Kenneth E. Harker wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:50:01AM -0700, Jack Brindle wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > You seem to be confusing a log checking and scoring process with what
>> > will actually happen on the air. Let's say for argument's sake that
>> > points from unique QSOs were removed from a log's score in the log
>> > checking process, and all contestants know that this will happen.
>> > Will this in any way change how they operate? Will you not log a QSO
>> > or tell someone to go away? Since you cannot predict which QSOs
>> > will or will not be uniques, it would have no effect whatsoever on
>> > how people operate. You will still want to work that local guy who
>> > gets on and makes one QSO with you because you have no idea whether or
>> > not they will also make other QSOs before the contest is over.
>> >
>>
>> Actually, this is likely to change the way I operate in rare cases. I
>> have
>> been known to solicit Sweepstakes contacts from net control stations, for
>> instance, when they pop up on my run frequency and tell me the net is
>> starting soon. I also take the time on Sunday to walk stations through
>> the Sweepstakes exchange, even on CW, when I have no idea whether they
>> will make another contact. Often (usually?), I suspect they won't.
>>
>> I am concerned that such a rule change will make contesters less likely
>> to be friendly to the very casual stations. I would certainly not choose
>> to not log it, unless there was a penalty, but I may also choose not to
>> try to get a QSO (especially in Sweepstakes) and may pass up the
>> opportunity to try to recruit a new contest operator.
>>
>> I have also engaged in rather long rag chews with slow stations sometimes
>> to get a multiplier in DX contests (from a multi-multi station where it
>> was worth the time to do so). I actually HOPE these stations will be
>> uniques.
>>
>> These are certainly "fringe" situations, but they do reflect things I do
>> and have done during contests.
>>
>> This discussion is making me less certain that not giving credit for
>> uniques is a BAD idea, especially if some competitive logs have 10
>> percent
>> uniques, but I think there may be unintended consequences. It is
>> certainly a valuable and interesting discussion.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Mark, KD4D
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/396 - Release Date: 7/24/2006
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|