To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU |
From: | "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net> |
Reply-to: | Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@pclink.com> |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:29:47 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
"Log checkers determining my score and not me - in my opinion is not the best. Having log checkers "judge" a claimed score - better or best. 73, Gord VE6SV" This concept leaves me scratching my head! I must be missing something. To me, whether your score is manually calculated or the result is automated through a consistent algorithm, the final determination rests with the contest sponsor, not the participants. You don't see Olympians challenging the scoring methodology in a timed event (downhill, bobsled, speed skating, etc.). 73 de Bob - K0RC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] ANR headsets, Peter Dougherty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique perspectives, Warren C. Stankiewicz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU, Mark Beckwith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |