Another succinct testimony why "Life is too short for QRP!" :-)
73 de Bob - K0RC
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:46:51 -0400
From: k3bu@optonline.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Cc: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>, Gord Kosmenko
<gkosmenko@arrowspeed.com>
Message-ID: <de39d5f02bdce.44c88b8b@optonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Yea, but no way for you to mark which QSO is 0 point, not to be counted.
Claimed score is for ???
If M/S goofs and makes illegal QSO because of the timing rule, they just take
it out of the log and me/you get hit and UNJUSTLY penalized. Some say so what,
everybody does get. But when you are QRP, make dozen QSOs and have quarter of
them taken away and possible record, it HURTS like hell. (not really, it only a
goofy hobby :-)
Yuri Blanarovich, K3BU
----- Original Message -----
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:04 am
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Gord Kosmenko wrote:
>
> >
> > The Cabrillo format log submission has no claimed score,
> > the logger checkers determine the score. I still do not
> > agree with this type of adjudication.
> >
>
> ??? My Cabrillo logs all have a line "CLAIMED-SCORE:" followed by
> a
> number.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|