CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG

To: "'RICHARD BOYD'" <ke3q@msn.com>,"'cq-contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:06:52 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
One of the advantages of KP4 is that the location gives you enough of a lead
that you can bust a bunch of QSOs and still win!  :)

Randy, K5ZD 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of RICHARD BOYD
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 6:07 PM
> To: cq-contest
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG
> 
> I had a number of "sixes" send their section as SD.  I 
> automatically converted that to SDG until I realized that one 
> of the sixes I was working probably was, I recalled, in South 
> Dakota, so I logged it as SD, which is what he sent.  Now I 
> wonder about those couple before that that had send SD -- 
> were they in South Dakota or in San Diego.  Oh well.  If I 
> lose a couple QSOs that won't kill me.  In hindsight, I 
> realize whenever I hear SD sent and it's not a zero, and 
> particularly if it's a six, I have to ask for clarification, "SDG?"
> 
> 73 - Rich, KE3Q
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>