You'd think so but, alas, I worked many N2 stations in WA and W6 Stations in
MDC. W1VE was in KY. I don't know how many different prefixes numbers I got
from Florida.
Because there is no absolute relationship between prefix number and
location, you just have to go with what you're given.
73 -- Paul VO1HE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rex Maner
> Sent: November 8, 2006 23:35
> To: N6KI Dennis Vernacchia; RICHARD BOYD
> Cc: cq-contest
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG
>
> > I doubt anyone in San Diego would be so stupid as to send SD.
>
> NOW NOW They already have sent ??6XXX for a call
> that should be the
> answer after all
>
> Quack
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "N6KI Dennis Vernacchia" <n6ki_73@sbcglobal.net>
> To: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
> Cc: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG
>
>
> > Any contestor, worth working, in San Diego, knows to send SDG
> >
> > Unless some real newbies showed up, I doubt anyone in San Diego
> > would be so stupid as to send SD
> >
> > 73, Dennis N6KI
> > Sandy Eggo
> >
> > RICHARD BOYD wrote:
> >> I had a number of "sixes" send their section as SD. I
> automatically
> >> converted that to SDG until I realized that one of the sixes I was
> >> working probably was, I recalled, in South Dakota, so I
> logged it as SD,
> >> which is what he sent. Now I wonder about those couple
> before that that
> >> had send SD -- were they in South Dakota or in San Diego.
> Oh well. If I
> >> lose a couple QSOs that won't kill me. In hindsight, I
> realize whenever
> >> I hear SD sent and it's not a zero, and particularly if
> it's a six, I
> >> have to ask for clarification, "SDG?"
> >>
> >> 73 - Rich, KE3Q
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.32/523 - Release
> Date: 11/7/2006
> > 1:40 PM
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|