To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs |
From: | Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | n2ic@arrl.net |
Date: | Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:31:20 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
N7mal wrote: > There are no 'gray' areas with L.O.T.W. You are either in a log or not in a > log, there's no negotiating. If the contest station copied your call wrong > 'SORRY you loose'. It's scary when I find myself in agreement with Mal :) . If all QSL managers has the same integrity as the LoTW program -- the call must match exactly, there wouldn't be this apparent contradiction between the contesting world and the DXing world. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Mike Coslo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Dick Green |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Ron Notarius W3WN |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Dick Green |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |