| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Poll (Signal reports yes/no) |
| From: | "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:58:51 +0200 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
When listening for 3B7C and 3B9C I always heard those mindless 59(9) reports in every qso. Have you been only cooking as a team member there? -----Original Message----- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul O'Kane Then, those who prefer to mindlessly repeat 59(9) in every QSO can continue to mindlessly repeat 59(9) in every QSO. The rest of us can, with a clear conscience, omit it. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, David Kopacz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, AD5VJ Bob |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Poll (Signal reports yes/no), Paul O'Kane |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Poll (Signal reports yes/no), Tom Haavisto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |