On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 22:03 -0700, Kevin Rowett wrote:
> Regional parties is perhaps a better overall solution to this problem.
> We've seen the growth of 7QP, NEQP, and perhaps the original W6 CQP
> could be considered regional.
And yet the MAQP folded after 2 years.
> Some parties support the use of a serial number, some don't. Would we require
> everyone to go to the exact same format?
how are we going to require State QSO parties to do anything, Kevin?
Massive boycott or something? not participate because a party requires a
checkable exchange instead of 599 for all exchanges?
It's all voluntary. I have some people who refuse to participate in
PAQSO because we require a mailed summary sheet. That is their right.
I like the differences.
- 73 de Mike N3LI -
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|