CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Writelog vs. N1MM

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Writelog vs. N1MM
From: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:04:53 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I am not a user of writelog.

I was also interesting in this so I looked at the website to give it a try.

Unfortunately the website has not been updated for a while.
There is no trial version available like Win-test so I cant try it. Only 
reference are some pictures and a manual.
 They manual only refers to the use of LPT as switching output.
No mentioning of any modern SO2R switching equipment.
Talks about Win95, 98, NT4 W2000. No XP and Vista.

I would not change to a program which has not been changed for 2 years, 
not even if everybody tells you it is the best there is.

Henk

No vista

Kevin Stockton schreef:
> Are their any contesters out there that have experimented with both Writelog 
> and N1MM?  If so, which did you prefer?  I've been using N1MM and it is a 
> great program, but some people have decided to go with Writelog instead of 
> N1MM, just curious why?
>  
> I'm particularly interested in comparisons between SO2R use.  W5XD no longer 
> makes the SO2R box for Writelog.  Do most people use this controller or 
> something different?  It seems very nice, especially since it contains 
> isolated keying that is separate from the computer.  
>  
> Any guidance would be appreciated.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> Kevin/N5DX
>
>
>       
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>   

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>