On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:53:51PM -0600, David Kopacz wrote:
>
> I am not in agreement with the CQWW committee's decision to publish logs
> without the implicit consent of the log owner simply to quell a fear of
> cheating, real or perceived.
I think that by submitting the log you consent to the log being made
public. And by not submitting your log you are not giving your
consent.
I think open logs are great. I have only looked at a few. I do not
see how publishing the logs assumes that everyone or anyone is
cheating. If anything it opens up the entire log checking process a
bit more - by allowing anyone to look at the logs and even do their
own log checking if they desire.
I rarely look at anyones logs but I will willing share my logs with
anyone. I only wish the ARRL would follow CQ's lead with open logs.
If anyone wants to see my sweepstakes logs - just ask. Or any
recordings I have made of a contest - even more useful and interesting
that the log.
--
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|