To: | <n2ic@arrl.net>, "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? |
From: | "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | K0HB <K0HB@ARRL.ORG> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:49:15 -0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > Where did this business about high bands being USB, and low bands being > LSB come > from, anyway ? > Way back when Moby Dick was a minnow, amateur SSB gear was truly SINGLE side band (not selectable sideband). IF's were in the 9Mc (before Hertz) range. The mixing schemes thus made everything below 9Mc LSB, and everything above USB. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his Radio" Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/ Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL! LoTW participant _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Jimk8mr |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 40 M "new" Approach, w0uo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Pete Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band?, Michael Tope |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |