CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Digital Mode One - was SS Musings...

To: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>, "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Digital Mode One - was SS Musings...
From: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Reply-to: K0HB <K0HB@ARRL.ORG>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:14:23 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If someone wants to copy Morse with a machine, I say more power to him. 
He's showing an interest in Morse.

Machine copy isn't my cup of tea, but I'm not in charge of other folks fun, 
not do I wish to be.

How some other guy copies Morse has no effect at all on my enjoyment.

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his Radio"
Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/
Request QSL at  ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
LoTW participant


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:26 PM
To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Digital Mode One - was SS Musings...

> If you're going to use a computer to decode a signal, there are far 
> better,
> faster and more efficient methods to relay information than with Morse 
> code.
> Although Samuel F. B. Morse envisioned his code being deciphered by
> machines, it has been done primarily by ear for the last 100+ years. I'm 
> all
> for keeping the tradition.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
>>
>> > I think of CW as a digital mode, just like RTTY.
>>
>> Sure it's a digital mode, but only when when you treat it
>> that way.
>>
>> CW operators decode CW by ear, and that's what distinguishes
>> them from digital operators.  If you didn't copy it by ear,
>> you can call it what you like but you can't call it a CW QSO.
>>
>> I suggest DM1 (Digital Mode One) might be a suitable description.
>> Then we could all aspire to DM1 endorsements for DXCC.
>>
>> 73,
>> Paul EI5DI
>>
>> ps - since there are quite a lot of digital modes, perhaps
>> we should plan for the future and call it DM01?
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>