| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? |
| From: | "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:12:54 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
f5vhj@orange.fr wrote: "If the casual operator does not know their exact location, they can leave the radio off." IMHO, this type of attitude is exactly what is NOT needed? Without the "casual" participant, scores would diminish tremendously, and make the later hours, very boring? 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Magic GP antenna, Zoltan Szoke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Tesla cup, Marijan Miletic |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, Milt, N5IA |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Is it time to reevaluate CQWWScoring Rules?, John |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |