You also need to remember that the scoring analysis is done with prior
operating habits and rules in mind. For example, I don't consciously work
more than 1 K station on each band except to grab the K mult or a zone mult.
If W6s were worth 3 points, I'd be working them half of the afternoon. It
certainly would make operating at night more interesting. Similar to IARU I
would think.
73 Rich NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zoltan Szoke" <ha5pp_zoli@yahoo.com>
To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 4:16 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
I have to add the follow factor(s) for this 'clever' topic:
* In HP cathegory need to difference between powers (somewhere the power
limit is 400 Watts - this is big handicap in 1500 Watts cathegory...sri, I
mean OM-Power 4000 Watts cathegory... :)
Bonus steps (by 500 Watts) would be:
DX QSO with 500 W: 3 x 1.2 points
.
DX QSO with 1000 W: 3 x 1.1 points
.
DX QSO with 1500 W: 3 x 1.0 points
.
DX QSO with 4000 W: 3 x 0 points
.
DX QSO with 10 kW: 3 x 00 points
* IMHO, need to difference between antenna system:
(under construction :)
73, Zoli HA5PP
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|