| To: | <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cluster network update - was: Reverse Beacon Network - too much success? |
| From: | "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET> |
| Date: | Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:28:53 +0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > As far as one open cluster is concerned, simply don't allow any nodes to > connect unless their users are authenticated. Right, so we have to start a new network of new node software that includes authentication. Isn't that what I said? The rest are just picky details. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [SCCC] Logging of power for ARRL DX Contest, Dennis Vernacchia |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Cluster Network Improvement, jpescatore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cluster network update - was: Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?, David Kopacz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?, Marijan Miletic |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |